State Revenue Departments and IRS (Data) Dig for Dollars
More and more states, and increasingly the IRS, are using a technique called data mining to determine if taxpayers are underreporting tax liabilities. Examples of results obtained by data mining: Texas receiving $5 million in back taxes on out-of-state purchases of private aircraft; California raised an additional $180 billion annually. Moreover, revenue agencies are becoming more aggressive in mining--once limited to tax returns, tax authorities are now cross-checking with other governmental agencies and, for some states, with commercial sources such as infoUSA. Future projections include governmental searches of business purchasing records and even credit card statements; a trend which understandably worries civil libertarians (not to mention economic libertarians for other reasons).
Clearly and understandably, the US Department of the Treasury and state Tax Departments are concerned about a perceived tax gap. A tricky balance ensues: what level of pursuit of tax dollars is acceptable from aggressive and even evading taxpayers? An additional question: would a consumption tax help from the standpoint of reducing the tax gap or hurt from the standpoint of encouraging greater intrusiveness in governmental data mining?
Clearly and understandably, the US Department of the Treasury and state Tax Departments are concerned about a perceived tax gap. A tricky balance ensues: what level of pursuit of tax dollars is acceptable from aggressive and even evading taxpayers? An additional question: would a consumption tax help from the standpoint of reducing the tax gap or hurt from the standpoint of encouraging greater intrusiveness in governmental data mining?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home